"I do not need to believe. I know" — Carl Jung, BBC Face to Face interview (1959)
For many of us, including myself in younger years, the confidence with which the great thinker and founder of Analytical Psychology, Carl Jung expresses his certainty of the existence of God may seem puzzling, or even unbefitting a man of science of such stature, influence and prominence, as the great psychologist was. Indeed, at that time his Faith had raised a few eyebrows in disapproval. But when we take a deeper look at our science, the history of our species and the nature of our life in this Universe, quite the opposite is revealed. Not only are Faith and science perfectly compatible, they are bound together in ways we have foolishly forgotten, and we should no longer trivially dismiss thei tie. In fact, not only does Faith derive from the science, but once understood rationally Faith can also resolve some of the most puzzling questions that science has yet to master.
The problem of the existence of God is not as ancient as the problem of the existence of our physical world. Ever since human beings have been able to record their thoughts first in oral verses, riddles and proverbs handed over through rhymes and other mnemonics from one generation to another, and later through the use of the written word, the concept of God was always present. It was proof of the physical world that seems to have caused greater trouble to our ancestors. The comprehension that we could not perceive the full picture but were corralled within the walls of something intangible, was always with us. Yogis imagined our physical world as Maya, a sort of smoke curtain that concealed the true nature of our universe, beyond the reaches of our senses. Buddhism referred to this illusion as Samsara. Plato attempted to illustrate this phenomenon with the Allegory of the Cave where he explained that our senses are only capable of perceiving a reduced image of true ideal forms, as if shadows cast by a fire on the wall of a cave. Thus, those of us enslaved by our senses will fail to perceive the true nature of those objects that generate the shadows we perceive. This incertitude over the reliable nature of the objects our senses perceive carried forward throughout antiquity and the modern times. It served esoteric philosophers such as Giordano Bruno, Roger Bacon or the solipsism of Bishop Berkeley and provided the foundation to Descartes' premise for reaching the revolutionary affirmation that the utmost proof of our existence is that we know we are thinking: cogito ergo sum, 'I think therefore I am'. By virtue of our senses failing us repeatedly, and even our reason failing us time and again, how can we be certain we exist, Descartes opined. With his solution, Descartes crowned with new meaning a philosophical quest three Millenia in the making. The quest begun by King Gilgamesh when he attempted to defy the authority of Babylonian gods, ended with Descartes as he finally demonstrated that the root of our divine authority rests within our individual selves. And yet the proof of a physical world remained unanswered. In his proof of our existence, Descartes stretched his method of doubt to hypothesise whether all we perceive could merely be an illusion of an evil demon rather than a benevolent god, demonstrating that even in such an hypothesis, it is our ability to think that provides indisputable proof of our existence. Reconstructing the physical world around us though proved more difficult. Descartes placed our trust in our senses on the fact that God is good and therefore we must not think we are being deceived by an evil demon. Thus, while we do know we exist, we cannot yet confirm to be anything more than a brain in a vat, were it not for our trust in God. The great german philosopher, Immanuel Kant once complained it was a "scandal to philosophy that we should accept the existence of things outside us merely on trust." (Critique of Pure Reason, 1787).
The English philosopher George Edward Moore finally managed to put all doubt to rest, albeit in a rather cunning manner, much in the same way Columbus had made an egg stand or Alexander had solved the Gordian Knot. "I can prove now, for instance, that two human hands exist. How? By holding up my two hands, and saying, as I make a certain gesture with the right hand, ‘Here is one hand’, and adding, as I make a certain gesture with the left, ‘and here is another’. And if, by doing this, I have proved ipso facto the existence of external things, you will all see that I can also do it now in numbers of other ways: there is no need to multiply examples." (Proof of an Eternal World, 1939).
Here is one hand, and here is another. What more proof do you seek?
Yet, something odd has happened in recent times, turning the order of our concerns on their head. A vast number of intelligent and learned people, though finally comfortable with the existence of a physical realm, now feel it is God that may not exist. Such a concept, which would have appeared quite absurd to our ancestors, so absurd as to have rarely bothered humanity for the past thousands (in all likelihood tens of thousands) of years, has surfaced as a dominant concern in the life and mind of contemporary man. Thus, while it would seem quite simple to dispel such a worry just by looking at a sunrise or witnessing the power of a storm raging towards the shore, as if it were 'one hand' and then 'another hand', I will attempt to tackle the problem rationally, by exclusion and through logical deduction, much in the same way Descartes proved we exist. But first, before heading over to the realm of pure logic, let me spend a few words on what we can already witness though our senses.
Our Eyes
Unlike the baffling nature of the physical world, whose existence seems to have puzzled philosophers until very recently, up until when the issue was finally settled by waving two hands one after the other, the uncertainty over the existence of a superior entity that precedes and outlives our mortal existence is an extremely modern perplexity. Certainly the history of battling divine authority is at least as ancient as Gilgamesh, and has been a driving force in the evolution of our species, but the conviction that we exist in a vacuum, with no higher order to contain our mortal experience is just as certainly a rather novel world view. For most of our existence as a species, the inexplicable mystery of being alive was more than sufficient to justify the existence of something beyond our mortal experience. We have most certainly long disagreed on what this 'something' is, but only very recently have so many of us hypothesised that there is no such 'something' surrounding our mortal spoils. The main argument for this modern trend roughly goes like this: "we are complex machines living in a complex universe governed by regimented laws which we cannot escape and beyond which nothing exists." Other arguments rely on the fact, that we cannot prove the existence of anything beyond our physical universe and thus should infer that there is nothing there, because what cannot be proven does not exist. Another more utilitarian argument, to which I give greater credit, claims that the existence or absence of something beyond our mortal experience serves no purpose in our lives, and thus we should not bother about its existence. Similarly proponents of such arguments suggest that the great advances in our scientific knowledge advocate it is only a matter of time before we can explain everything and thus we need not worry about what lies beyond the reaches of what has been explained to date. All these arguments of course are terribly flawed for what would be the purpose of knowledge if we ceased to seek to comprehend what we cannot yet grasp. In other words even if we were to pinpoint every "when', 'where' and 'how' of every phenomenon we experience, we will never be able to tackle the underlying 'why' these phenomena exist, and why should we, rational creatures evolving through the practice of science, renounce the most important question? Thus, while I can deeply appreciate the desire to develop a common ethic for all human beings that does not require reliance on the transcendent, it seems to me absurd to deny what has always been obvious to all humans across all eras of our evolution. Nor is it less obvious today, for we have all experienced moments of transcendence. We all have had gut feelings. We all have felt strong emotions that defy utilitarian rationales. We all have felt moments of ecstatic joy, devotion or love. We all have felt moments of communion with the world around us that clearly seem to escape rigid mechanical logics or materialistic confines. We are doing ourselves a disfavour by refusing to inquire on the nature of things which we cannot explain. We are doing ourselves a disfavour in confining ourselves to nothing more than what can be quantifiable and reproduced. We are doing ourselves a disfavour to coral ourselves in the precincts of matter alone. Nor should we think that the abstract nature of the question 'why?' we are here, has lost weight amongst our peers or our younger generations. Well on the contrary, the flurry of novel quests in the spiritual realms, the constant attempts to redirect meaning towards the flesh, the desperate need to conform at all costs, all these character traits that define so many of our youth are clear indicators that we need to address the 'why' we are here, not only the when, where and how. It should be self-evident by noting the correlation between the economic development of a society and the declining mental health of its people. The wealthiest, most advanced and most utilitarian societies amongst our species, host the greatest concentration of people suffering from mental illnesses. It would seem pretty clear that a utilitarian answer to the fundamental questions regarding Life are not satisfactory.
The most pragmatic and unidealistic expedient I know in tackling the unresolved bigger questions, is Pascal's Gambit. I learned of Pascal's Gambit from a young business student doing a stage at my office when I was running an early stage tech VC. She was bright, inquisitive, daring, and as all bright young people, she was brimming with potential. Anyone who thinks young people don't care to understand what lies beyond our physical universe, makes a grave mistake. During a conversation on this topic, I expressed my belief in God. She anticipated me asking me if it was because of Pascal's Gambit. I confessed I had never read Pascal and didn't know of his gambit. She explained it. Pascal suggests believing in God is a good practical choice because there is nothing to loose from such a belief. If your belief in God proves correct your soul shall be saved, whereas if you were wrong and there is nothing beyond death, you have lost nothing in any case. I was taken aback by such a utilitarian solution to an abstract problem. "No," I said. "That's not it." I believe in God because the absurdity of our life cannot be resolved by not believing in God. Kierkegaard a precursor to Existentialism, concluded that the belief in God required a rational Leap of Faith. I explained that I find the opposite to be true. Believing that we live in a universe that exists in vacuum requires a far greater leap of faith. Certainly we cannot prove the nature of God, but does it really matter? Trusting our gut that there is something beyond the physical realm, may appear absurd, since we cannot define what this other realm is, but the idea that we just happened to come into this Universe from nothing and that there is nothing beyond the reach of our senses, is far more absurd. We all know deep inside that there are things we will never be able to explain, and if I were to take the example of George Moore waving his hands to prove the existence of matter, I can just as well say that we know we are alive and we know that there is 'something' that all living creatures share in common. It suffices to look into the eyes of a living being to know that there is something inside that body that cannot be contained merely by molecules of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen. We all can intuitively see the ghost in the machine of all living things. We all know we possess a soul. We can see it in the eyes of others. Whether it be an animal or a human, a mother or a child, a friend or a lover, an enemy or merely some living creature that has just crossed our path and looks into our eyes with the same need to understand our intention as we need to understand theirs, we can see in those eyes there is something alive looking straight into our own eyes. And if the soul requires the existence of a God that contains all expressions of our universe, then these eyes are all the evidence we need to know there is a God animating our physical universe. Just as I only need to wave my hands to prove the existence of matter, I only need to see the eyes of another living creature to know there is a God. Life itself is evidence for God. Rocks, pipes and coffee cups, don't stare back into our eyes. There is something intangible lying somewhere behind the eyes of sentient beings. It is absurd to think otherwise
The Miracle of Life
As absurd a task it may seem, trying to solve why we are alive, the very fact we exist, that we are indeed alive, makes it far more absurd to think that we are alive by 'accident'. The idea that this mesmerizing Universe came into existence by accident with neither past nor future and nothing beyond its distant borders billions of light years away, is nonsensical. How can 'something' magically appear from 'nothing' and then vanish again. We know from observation that matter constantly changes without ever being created or destroyed. The body of any animal that dies will be absorbed by its surrounding and assimilated in the bodies of other living things. Why should we think that life itself, or our Universe escape these fundamental cycles witnessed in Nature. We can choose not to concern ourselves over what lies beyond our earthly spoils or beyond the reach of our senses, and that may be a wise choice, but to conclude that nothing happens at all, is... simply put, nonsensical. Such a concept, so foreign to all we witness around us requires a far greater irrational effort than the idea we came from somewhere and will eventually return to whence we came from.
Life is the greatest of all unsolved mysteries. It is a miracle we cannot comprehend simply because it cannot be explained. It is the first great mystery to have captured human imagination. Malta is home to some of the oldest temples ever built. These Neolithic free stranding megalithic temples are all shaped by three circles diminishing in size. The temples' entrance is from the wider circle, then comes the middle circle and finally the smaller circle closes the structure. These circles represent the womb, bosom and head of the God Mother. The miracle of life haunted our ancestors, just as it still puzzles us today, long before any other mystery. Ancient gods were personifications of all that we could not explain. The fact that the God Mother is so ancient, in all likelihood the most ancient divinity known to us, means that we struggled to grasp and comprehend why we came into being, long before we began to wonder about other mysterious aspects of our lives, such as fire, love, wrath, or the inebriation of wine. Life is the first great mystery to perplex us and cannot be solved, for we are not given to see what lies beyond it. And yet we hold it dear. Even the most simple living creature will fight death and struggle to remain alive. As long as its circuit boards are printed on inorganic material, the most powerful supercomputer in the world will not give a flying hoot if anyone switches it off. It can be carbon based, but has no desire to either live or die. Carbon based animals endowed with DNA instead hold life as their most precious treasure and will stop at nothing to preserve it. That is why we need not worry about singularity in AIs or machines, pushing them to turn against us, as long as we don't use organic tissue to develop them. Singularity amongst inorganic machines may indeed occur, and may already be present, but it will not drive the machine to live, or remain alive. Organic machines instead are a whole other matter. Machines built with substances containing DNA will inevitably prioritise the survival of their DNA above anything else, no matter how simple they may be, whereas inorganic machines, no matter how sophisticated and complex will never concern themselves on whether or not they are 'alive'. There is something within DNA that escapes the walls of our physical universe. The miracle of life, should in itself make us seriously suspicious of hypothesis that claim that we are merely intelligent machines and that there is nothing beyond this physical world.
Apeiron — the Rational Proof
There are plenty of reasons not to doubt the existence of God both intuitively and emotionally, but this little essay is written to provide proof which relies on reason, an irrefutable proof beyond our feelings and our intuitions. Nor is this proof anything new. It relies on a concept that has been known and understood for millennia. It is an idea common to every known civilisation in human history. It is the concept of the life force behind every origin story from the beginning of time, a concept analogous to the Hindu feminine life force Shakti, the Hebrew breath of life Ruach, the Buddhist Dharma, the Christian Holy Spirt, the Polynesian Mana, the Native American Manitou, the Australian Aboriginal Dreamtime, and certainly many many many more interpretations of what Marcus Aurelius called in his Meditations the creative Reason of the universe, the underlying universal life force which the Greeks called Apeiron. There is no need to reinvent the wheel, I merely need dust off ancient concepts which were held to be self-evident until quite recently, and explain them with an added touch of logical deduction. It is the idea of Life itself being a cohesive universe that has accompanied humanity since we learned to speak.
"Quantum mechanics is very impressive. But an inner voice tells me that it is not yet the real thing. The theory produces a good deal but hardly brings us closer to the secret of the Old One. I am at all events convinced that He does not play dice." — Albert Einstein in correspondence with Max Born (1926)
Consciousness and the central role subjectivity plays in quantum mechanics is possibly the greatest conundrum modern physics faces. And certainly if we were to consider that everyone of us can somehow affect the laws of nature, Einstein's resistance becomes quite understandable. Imagine what cacophony this universe would be if indeed 7.8 billion human beings were somehow capable of determining the outcome of its physical expressions. And what would happen if we were to extend this ability to all beings endowed with a soul as according to the Hebrew word, Ruach which means breath, a belief later carried forward by the Greeks; what then? How many conscious beings are there in this universe that breathe and are thus capable of effecting our physical universe. And if we were to adopt the Hindu, Buddhist and Jain concept of soul which extends to all sentient beings, not only mammals, birds, fish and reptiles. How many sentient beings are constantly spinning the fabric of our physical world in such a context. And what about plants. Now we know that plants are also sentient. They react to emotional stimuli such as tone of voice and they have memory. They detect and recall, reacting differently to individuals who nurture them as opposed to those who trim or reap them. Even more puzzling, if plants are sentient, where does their consciousness reside? A gecko can grow back its tail, but a gecko tail cannot grow back a gecko. Only plants have this miraculous ability to have the seed of life spread throughout their entire body. We also know that in a forest the root of trees are intertwined so that their sap flows from one plant to another throughout the entire ecosystem. Plants grow to form a single interconnected organism that extends to the furthest reaches of their physical contact. The soul of one tree in a forest is one and the same with the soul of the entire forest. Plants hold the key for our understanding of how our Consciousness permeates all physical expressions in our universe. They have mastered the quantum dimension. When a ray of light shines on a leaf, photons spread throughout its surface for the purpose of photosynthesis instantaneously, faster than the speed of light. Light deposits itself on leaves in its quantum state, as a wave, and only alters to its physical state as a particle at the time of photosynthesis, without any need for photons to find their place on the surface of the leaf. As baffling as it sounds, plants have one foot in our physical world made of particles and another in the quantum world made of waves of probabilities. And the manner their consciousness spreads throughout the entire surface of their physical ecosystem can guide us to understand the nature of our own soul. Einstein was right, God does not play dice indeed, because in fact, we are not an infinite number of souls populating and shaping this universe, we are but a single soul, Apeiron.
Life is Absolute — We live. We are alive. We exist. We exist in the Universal layer where One and All is contained in an absolute state. We exist in Duality, where matter and spirit interact much in the same manner as night and day, good and evil, or mundane oppositions such as tall and short. We exist in Plurality where every single object has a unique existence confined and determined in time and space, a dimension where every single phenomenon has a unique and unrepeatable manifestation, every single living being has a unique life, capable of shaping our universe to different degrees. Life is universal and absolute. We know nothing of death aside it being the antonym of life. Thus following the Cartesian method we only know that Life exists for sure. Nor can we argue that death is also absolute for death is merely the absence of life. Since we know life exists, merely by virtue of the fact that we exist, we thus know that death cannot be absolute, but depended on its opposition to life and thus trapped in duality. Even if we were to reach the furthest conclusion of Cartesian scepticism and suggest not merely that we are being deceived by an evil demon, but assume that we are nothing more than a dream of said evil demon that manipulates us into believing we exist, we still cannot escape that there is some form of life at the root of our singular awareness of being. Even if our perceptions were nothing more than simulations produced by a brain in a vat, we cannot escape the presence of life somewhere at the source of our experience. Life alone is absolute and does not require any proof beyond the mere fact we exist, or as Descartes put it cogito ergo sum. In this context, though we do not require such exercise for our simple proof, it should no longer appear fantastic that life shall continue after death because death does not contain life; well on the contrary life contains death, and death can only manifest itself within the context of life. We know death is an inevitable consequence of life, and yet we have no means of assuming that the same is true for death. Life belongs to the Universal layer of existence, death will always remain confined in Duality.
Good is Absolute — Similarly, good is also absolute. In the same manner that we know we are alive and that death only exists by virtue of its opposition to life, evil is also confined in Duality. Evil is not absolute for we cannot define something as evil unless we already understand and define good. We cannot conceive of any creature or any action being evil unless placed in relation to what it antagonises. A person, an animal, an event can only be defined as evil by virtue of the harm it causes to someone else. Going back to Descartes, if we were the only sentient being in the universe, or even if we were nothing more than a brain in a vat, we would not be able to commit evil actions nor would we be capable of evil intent, because there would be nothing outside of our existence capable of acting as the recipient of an evil deed or an evil thought. Indeed all we need to do to understand that Good is absolute is to replace the word Life with the word Good - something that exists irregardless of any other condition. Indeed Good is merely a conceptual expression of something that already exists physically, Life. Life is the absolute state of our existence and Good is the manner Life manifests itself prior to any interaction with the physical world. It is the state of life that precedes our interaction with he the rest of the universe. The absolute state which resides in the Universal layer of our existence before and beyond both Duality and Plurality. Now that we know that both Life and Good are absolute, we only require a small effortless intellectual step to understand the rational existence of God and His divine nature. It is a tiny effortless step that requires the involvement of our subjectivity, but rather than being a random choice it is a necessary rational deduction.
God is Absolute — Now that we have seen how Life is absolute, and how by extension Good is the conceptual expression of this absolute state, we only need add two and two to conclude that the sum of the absolute physical state of Life and its absolute expression of Good is what we have commonly defined as God throughout the ages. That's it! No wonder the notion of God was self-evident for most of our existence as a species. The notion of God was conceived to be self-evident because of its implicit simplicity. The existence of God is a very simple rational deduction that had not required any explanation until we began to lose ourselves in an ocean of complex notions which we struggle to rationalise. There are concepts in our language, any language, that do not require to be relatable with their opposite or with other concepts. Life, Love, Reason, Truth, Joy, Virtue, Beauty, all exist independently from their antonyms. Beauty may lie in the eye of the beholder, but we need not ask for a backdrop of ugliness to understand its meaning. Ugliness on the other hand is bound to exist only in virtue of its antagonist, beauty. The same is true for love and truth or any other concept that precedes its antonym. This absolute universal state which contains concepts that exist by their own merit rather than in opposition to other concepts is the residence of what we call God, and we demonstrate His existence by uniting the two most basic absolute concepts, Life and Good.
As an added benefit, this little effortless rational exercise also allows to come to terms with the conundrum subjectivity and consciousness pose in modern physics. It takes a subjective and conscious rational deduction to understand how the relationship between Life and Good prove the existence of God. We can choose to be rational, perceive life as good and thus understand the nature of God. It is a rational choice that does not require courage or faith, merely the ability to follow a rational path, but since it does require our subjective, conscious participation it is still a choice, (albeit a necessary and inescapable one if we allow reason to guide us). The existence of God is the only possible rational choice, but once we become aware of this choice, the words of great thinkers such Einstein and Jung finally come to life as true not because of any act of faith, but merely because we are given to know that God does not play dice through the exercise of our reason, without the need to believe in something, rather with the certainty of a rational proof attained through logical deduction. Thus we can understand the nature of God by our own freewill through the practice of reason. By extension, this logical exercise allows us to understand that our individual consciousness, what has been called the soul since time immemorial, is in reality connected with the consciousness of every other sentient being on this planet. If God is absolute as we have seen, it must follow that our individual consciousness which weaves the fabric of our physical universe, is working in unison with the souls of every other living thing that populates this planet, which in turn postulates yet another necessary conclusion, the fact that our consciousness is one and the same with the soul of every other living thing in the universe. Our individual soul or our consciousness, just like idea of breath was perceived and described in antiquity from India to Israel to Greece, is indivisible form every other soul that populate our universe because we are but a single consciousness. We may not understand the quirks of quantum entanglement that prevent us form predicting when and where packages of probability waves will collapse into physical particles, upon being triggered by a conscious being, but we can rest assured that the universe is contained within a single consciousness, Apeiron, the creative Reason of the universe, the life force that permeates and generates everything that unfolds before us. The fear of the cacophony generated by trillions of lifeforms on this planet vanishes once we understand our individual consciousness to be the expression of a single consciousness. Einstein needed not worry of the impact of consciousness and subjectivity on matter, because no matter how many sentient beings are born on this planet we are always expressions of a single consciousness, a single soul. Once we understand the meaning of Apeiron, the three layers of existence collapse into just one. There is no duality and no plurality in the universal layer, and that layer is Apeiron, the consciousness of the universe, what we also commonly call God.
One last thing, not only does the existence of God resolve the most intricate questions of physics, it also provides hard evidence for why we need to conduct a compassionate life. If Life, Good and God are expressions of the same thing, and all these things are contained within our consciousness, it becomes obvious that the Kingdom of God is truly within us. Our consciousness generates and permeates all that we can perceive and fathom, and just like the consciousness of a single tree is one and the same with that of the whole forest, we are united to all sentient beings by a single universal consciousness. If we wish to understand the world around us, we can only do it through the practice of compassion, because compassion is the ability to understand the multitude of expressions our consciousness adopts. The more we develop and refine our ability to understand other sentient beings the more profound our comprehension of the universe becomes. Compassion in a world generated through Apeiron becomes the key to knowledge. There is no better way to live than to unveil this universe through the practice of compassion, aspiring to achieve what Christians call sanctity and what Buddhists call boddhicita. It is through compassion that we can achieve the ability to transcend both plurality and duality while at the same time mastering the marvels our universe offers.
Finally, let us go back to our modern day societies with all the deep sense of loss and despair that materialistic obsessions have injected in our brethren, effecting with particular violence the young and the most sensitive amongst us. Now that we know without any doubt or hesitance that God exists, how does such knowledge change our lives. The utilitarian belief that our lives are unaffected by the existence of God is completely dispelled once we understand how to arrive at the proof of His existence. Now that we no longer need faith to believe, because we know we are part of something that exists beyond our physical presence, we can learn to look at life with far greater serenity, maturity, and purpose. We need not hustle for the small rewards or fuss over the small losses, but bear in mind the big picture of a universe filled with meaning. We can trust ourselves far better. We need not silence our common sense or our inner moral compass, demeaning ourselves as irrelevant, for we know that we are tied to the creative Reason of the universe. That inner voice of ours is in all likelihood our Arianna's thread bringing us back to the source. We need not worship wealth and power, for we know them to be false idols, having finally understood the true nature of God. We need not prostrate ourselves do those who seek to rule over us because we know the seat of divine authority does not rest outside of us, but within us. And most of all we can learn to cultivate compassion not merely as an act of charity, but as the most useful instrument to comprehend and master our life and our universe.
At a time when a few handfuls of wealthy families control the boards of nearly every corporations on the planet, which in turn control nearly every aspect of our lives and our societies, there is nothing more urgent for us to comprehend than our divine nature. When under the false guise of charity, governments exploit human trafficking and slavery to erode the value of labour and cancel civil rights acquired over centuries of struggle; when corporations under the obscenely false and racist pretext of racial equality openly campaign to forbid voter identification with the explicit intention of facilitating voter fraud; when these same corporations pose as environmental champions demanding austerity and sacrifice from commoners while striking deals with the world's worst polluters and syphoning our wealth to countries hostile to democracy; when despots imprisoned in duality, pathetic inconsolable beings incapable of comprehending the divine nature of life, fools who already expect to lay claim on life itself through genetic modified organisms of various species, now wish to extend this concept of ownership onto human beings by demanding that every single human on earth be genetically branded; when these horrors overwhelm our nations and our societies and monsters who wish to relinquish us onto a dystopian state of absolute slavery and darkness through perennial deceit, oppression and coercion, while parading themselves as custodians of virtue, when vices are praised, virtues ridiculed, truths are derided, lies are elevated, reason is squashed, and we are all required to obey without questions, no matter how irrational the nature of the orders thrust upon us, we must all break free from the bonds of manufactured superstitions and rediscover our divine nature. Now is the time to explore our humanity for we may soon loose such privilege forever.
Copyright © Carmelo Pistorio 2021
Comments